Model of Operational Cohesion and Synergy Between the Air/Aerospace Offense and Air and Missile Defense Domains in Multi-Domain Operations
Author
Assistant Professor of ational Defense University,Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background & Purpose: The expansion of Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) and the simultaneous employment of military, cyber, intelligence, and space capabilities have created complex opportunities and challenges for the offensive and defensive structures of modern states. Moreover, as the battlespace increasingly extends into the air and space domains, achieving operational integration between air/aerospace offensive operations and air and missile defense, together with continuous intelligence and operational coordination between these two domains, has become a strategic priority for the armed forces of advanced countries. Accordingly, this study aims to develop a model for enhancing operational integration and synergy between the air/aerospace offensive and air and missile defense domains within the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, with the objective of strengthening multi-domain operations.
Methodology: This study is developmental–applied in terms of purpose and adopts a mixed-methods (qualitative–quantitative) descriptive–analytical approach. The study population consisted of 125 experts and specialists in the fields of air/aerospace offensive operations and air and missile defense drawn from various branches of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews, while quantitative data were obtained using researcher-developed questionnaires. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS software.
Findings: The findings revealed that six key components play the most significant roles in achieving operational integration and synergy between the air/aerospace offensive and air and missile defense domains. These components, ranked in order of importance, are: integrated command and control, mission coordination, information synergy, threat information sharing, operational domain overlap, and integration of communication systems. These elements constitute the core dimensions of the proposed conceptual model.
Conclusion: The proposed model provides a practical framework for designing, optimizing, and developing integrated command-and-control systems, establishing joint operational headquarters, and enhancing coordination and operational integration mechanisms between the air/aerospace offensive and air and missile defense domains within the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Implementing this model can improve the effectiveness of multi-domain operations, strengthen operational synergy, and enhance the country's defense capability and strategic deterrence.
Methodology: This study is developmental–applied in terms of purpose and adopts a mixed-methods (qualitative–quantitative) descriptive–analytical approach. The study population consisted of 125 experts and specialists in the fields of air/aerospace offensive operations and air and missile defense drawn from various branches of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews, while quantitative data were obtained using researcher-developed questionnaires. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS software.
Findings: The findings revealed that six key components play the most significant roles in achieving operational integration and synergy between the air/aerospace offensive and air and missile defense domains. These components, ranked in order of importance, are: integrated command and control, mission coordination, information synergy, threat information sharing, operational domain overlap, and integration of communication systems. These elements constitute the core dimensions of the proposed conceptual model.
Conclusion: The proposed model provides a practical framework for designing, optimizing, and developing integrated command-and-control systems, establishing joint operational headquarters, and enhancing coordination and operational integration mechanisms between the air/aerospace offensive and air and missile defense domains within the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Implementing this model can improve the effectiveness of multi-domain operations, strengthen operational synergy, and enhance the country's defense capability and strategic deterrence.
Keywords
Subjects
بختیارینژاد، کاظم، خادمدقیق، امیرهوشنگ، باقری، محمدحسن، و همت، حمید.(1403). الگوی سامانه فرماندهی و کنترل در عملیات مشترک ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات دفاعی استراتژیک، 22(97)، 117-142.
بیکبیلندی، علیاصغر، رودگرصفاری، مهدی، دادوند، حسین، دیبا، محمدرضا، و سلیمی، رضا(1402). الگوی اجرای جنگ ترکیبی. فصلنامه مدیریت دفاع هوایی، 2(3)، 47-71.
حیدریان، محسن، و خادمدقیق، امیرهوشنگ(1398). الگوی فرماندهی و کنترل هوایی در جنگهای آینده. نشریه آیندهپژوهی دفاعی،4(14)، 61-86.
رزمآرا، علیرضا()1399. طرحریزی عملیات مشترک و ترکیبی. تهران: دانشگاه فرماندهی و ستاد ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران (دافوس).
فرنیا، فرهاد، شهرآئینی، سید اسماعیل، جباررشیدی، علی، و رمضانی دهقانی، رسول(1402). طراحی الگوی راهبردی شبکه فرماندهی و کنترل پدافند هوایی با بهرهگیری از فناوری دفتر کل توزیعشده. فصلنامه راهبرد دفاعی، 21(84)، 39-63.
قنبری، محمدعلی(1399). طراحی الگوی فرماندهی و کنترل مشترک در عملیاتهای تلفیقی دفاعی. رساله دکتری، دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی، تهران.
Alberts, D. S., & Hayes, R. E. (2003). Power to the edge: Command and control in the information age. Command and Control Research Program (CCRP).
Alberts, D. S., & Hayes, R. E. (2006). Understanding command and control. Command and Control Research Program (CCRP), U.S. Department of Defense.
Bronk, J. (2023). The Air War in Ukraine: The First Year of Conflict. Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), London.
Carvalho, E. J. (2011). Puerto Rican radical: The effects of neoliberalism on the life and work of Martín Espada (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Costello, J., & McReynolds, J. (2018). China’s Strategic Support Force: A force for a new era. Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University.
Department of the Army. (2022). Field Manual 3-0: Operations. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
Freedman, L. (2020). The future of war: A history. PublicAffairs.
Janowitz, M. (1991). On social organization and social control. University of Chicago Press.
Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC). (2023). Air and Space Power in Multi-Domain Operations. Kalkar, Germany: Joint Air Power Competence Centre.
Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2019). Joint Publication 3-30: Command and control of joint air operations. U.S. Department of Defense.
Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2020). Joint All-Domain Operations (JADO). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
MacCoun, R. J., Kier, E., & Belkin, A. (2006). Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? Armed Forces & Society, 32(4), 646–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X05283099
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Prentice-Hall.
NATO. (2022). NATO Warfighting Capstone Concept (NWCC). Brussels, Belgium: North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Renz, B. (2018). Russia’s military revival. Polity Press.
Reynolds, C., & Reece, J. (2023). Multi-Domain Operations and Integrated Air and Missile Defense. U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute.
Rubin, U. (2020). Israel’s Multi-Tier Missile Defense. BESA Center
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command. (2018). The U.S. Army in multi-domain operations 2028 (TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1). Department of the Army.
U.S. Department of Defense. (2022). Summary of the Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2) strategy. U.S. Department of Defense.