احصاء شاخصهای دانشگاه نسل جدید با رویکرد تحلیل مضمون و آنتروپی شانون

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 استاد، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

4 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: در دهه‌های اخیر، تغییرات سریع در محیط‌های علمی، فناوری و اجتماعی، دانشگاه‌ها را به سوی نقش‌آفرینی جدیدی سوق داده است. مفهوم دانشگاه نسل جدید به عنوان مدلی تکامل‌یافته از دانشگاه‌های سنتی و پژوهشی، بر تعامل پویا با جامعه، نوآوری، کارآفرینی و پاسخگویی به نیازهای جامعه تأکید دارد. آگاهی از ویژگی­های دانشگاه­های نسل جدید، گامی موثر جهت پیاده­سازی آن در دانشگاه­ها است. از این رو، هدف این پژوهش احصاء شاخصهای دانشگاه‌های نسل جدید است. 
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر به روش آمیخته اکتشافی از نوع متوالی کیفی -کمی انجام شده است. بخش کیفی مبتنی بر تحلیل مضمون و با بکارگیری ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات، فهرست بازبینی اسناد موجود در زمینه دانشگاههای نسل جدید است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل 228 سند در مورد دانشگاههای نسل جدید است که با در نظر گرفتن معیارهای ورود، 76 سند وارد تحلیل شد. بخش کمی مبتنی بر آنتروپی شانون و با بکارگیری ابزار پرسشنامه انجام گرفته است. مشارکت کنندگان ۱۴ نفر از اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاههای سطح تهران بودند که به روش نمونهگیری قضاوتی هدفمند انتخاب شدند.
یافته‌ها: یافته­های پژوهش نشان دادکه دانشگاههای نسل جدید دارای دو دسته شاخص­های درونی و بیرونی هستند. از بین ویژگیهای درونی داشتن فرهنگ و تفکر کارآفرینی، هوشمندی و دموکراسی در دانش، بهرهبرداری از فرصتهای بازار و ارائه راهحلهای نوین، مدیریت دانش و از بین ویژگیهای بیرونی همکاری با صنعت، دستیابی به منابع مالی جایگزین برای تامین هزینه تحقیقات، توسعه روابط با عرصه بینالملل، جامعه محوری و حساسیت به مسائل آن و توجه به مردم و مسائل آنها بیشترین ضریب اهمیت را دارند.
نتیجه‌گیری: دانشگاه‌های نسل جدید به عنوان نهادهای پیشرو در توسعه علمی، فناوری و اقتصادی، نیازمند شاخص‌های مشخص و قابل سنجش برای تحقق مأموریت‌های خود هستند. احصاء و به‌کارگیری این شاخص‌ها می‌تواند به ارتقای کیفیت آموزش، بهبود جایگاه دانشگاه در نظام ملی و بین‌المللی و افزایش نقش آن در توسعه پایدار منجر شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying Indicators of the New Generation University with the Thematic Analysis Approach and Shannon Entropy

نویسندگان [English]

  • yousef vakili 1
  • akbar hassanpoor 2
  • Abdolrahim Navehebrahim, 3
  • forouzan safari ojghaz, 4
1 1) Assistant Prof., Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Prof., Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Prof,, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University,
4 Ph. D student in Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background & Purpose: In recent decades, rapid changes in the scientific, technological, and social environments have pushed universities to take on a new role. The concept of the new generation university, as an evolved model of traditional and research universities, emphasizes dynamic interaction with society, innovation, entrepreneurship, and responsiveness to the needs of society. Awareness of the characteristics of new generation universities is an effective step towards its implementation in universities. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to identify the indicators of new generation universities.
Methodology: The present research was conducted using a mixed exploratory method of sequential qualitative-quantitative type. The qualitative part is based on thematic analysis and, the review list of existing documents in the field of new generation universities as the information gathering tool was used. The statistical population of this research includes 228 documents about new generation universities, by considering the entry criteria, 76 documents were included in the analysis. Quantitative part is based on Shannon Entropy and using questionnaire tool. The participants were 14 faculty members of universities in Tehran, who were selected by purposeful judgmental sampling.
Findings: The findings of the research showed that new generation universities have two categories of indicators including internal and external indicators. Among the internal features, having an entrepreneurial culture and thinking, intelligence and democracy in knowledge, exploiting market opportunities and providing new solutions, knowledge management, and among the external features, cooperation with the industry, obtaining alternative financial resources to finance research, developing relationships With the international arena, society-centeredness and sensitivity to its issues and attention to people and their issues have the highest coefficient of importance.
Conclusion: New generation universities, as leading institutions in scientific, technological, and economic development, require specific and measurable indicators to fulfill their missions. The collection and application of these indicators can lead to the improvement of the quality of education, the improvement of the university's position in the national and international system, and the increase of its role in sustainable development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • New Generation University
  • Thematic Analysis
  • Shannon Entropy
Ahmadian Chashemi, M., Niazazari, K. and Salehi, M. (2020). Identifying the components of the fourth generation university to improve the quality of education and research in Islamic Azad universities. Curriculum Research, 1(1), 110-121. .[in Persian]
Abbasi, H., Nasiri Qorqani, B., Sorani Yancheshmeh, R. and Mosleh, M. (2019). Priorities of effective components of the third generation of medical universities with the AHP approach, Teb va Tazkiye, (1)28, 16-36.[in Persian]
Campbell, D. F. J. and Güttel, W. H. (2005). Knowledge Production of Firms: Research Networks and the Scientification of Business R&D. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(1/2), 152–175.
Campbell, D. F. J. (2006). The University/Business Research Networks in Science and Technology: Knowledge Production Trends in the United States, European Union and Japan . In Carayannis, E. G. and Campbell, D. F. J. (Eds.), Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters. A Comparative Systems Approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. 67–100). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Carayannis, E.G. and Campbell, D.F.J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. New York, NY: Springer Briefs in Business, Springer.
Campbell, D.F.J. and Carayannis, E.G. (2013) Epistemic Governance in Higher Education: Quality Enhancement of Universities for Development, Springer Briefs in Business, Springer, New York, NY.
Carayannis, E.G. and Campbell, D.F.J. (2009). Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46, 201–234.
Carayannis, E. G. and Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1), 41-69.
Carayannis, E.G. and Campbell, D.F.J. (2011) Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 327–372.
Carayannis, E.G. and Rakhmatullin, R. (2014) ‘The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialization strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond’,Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.212–239.
Campbell, D. F. and Carayannis, E. G. (2016). The academic firm: a new design and redesign proposition for entrepreneurship in innovation-driven knowledge economy. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship5(1), 1-10.
Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J., Grigoroudis, E.,Meissner, D., and Stamati, D. (2017) “Mode 3” universitiesand academic firms: thinking beyond the box transdisciplinarityand non-linear innovation dynamics within co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journalof Technology Management. Availableat:http://www.inderscience.com/info/ingeneral/forthcoming.php?jcode=ijtm.
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F., Meissner, D. and Stamati, D. (2018). 'Mode 3'universities and academic firms: thinking beyond the box trans-disciplinarity and nonlinear innovation dynamics within coopetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Technology Management77(1-3), 145-185.
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F., Meissner, D. and Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co‐opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&d Management48(1), 148-162.
Davey, T., Rossano, S. and Van Der Sijde, P. (2016). Does context matter in academic entrepreneurship? The role of barriers and drivers in the regional and national context. The Journal of Technology Transfer41, 1457-1482.
Edwards, J., Gianelle, C., Kyriakou, D., and Midtkandal, I. (2015) Smart specialisation for regional economic transformation. Asia-Pacific Tech Monitor, 32, 13–18.
Efimov, V.S., Lapteva, A.V., Rumiantsev, M.V., Dadasheva, V.A., Efimov, A.V. (2012b). Budushcheevysshei shkoly Rossii: ekspertnyi vzgliad. Forsait issledovanie – 2030: analiticheskii doklad [The futureof a higher school in Russia: expert opinion. Foresight Study – 2030: analytical report]. KrasnoyarskSiberian Federal University, 181 p.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy32(1), 109-121.
Etzkowitz, H.; Mello, J., (2004), “Rise of the Brazilian Triple Helix”, International Journal of Technology Management and Sutainable Development, Vol. 2, No. 3.
Etzkowitz, H. ,2008, ‘The Triple Helix. University- Industry- Government, Innovation in Action’. Routledge. London.
Etzkowitz, H. (2014). 2 The second academic revolution: The rise of the entrepreneurial university and impetuses to firm foundation. Building Technology Transfer within Research Universities: An Entrepreneurial Approach, 12-32.
Eurostat (2014) GDP per capita in the EU in 2011: seven capital regions among the ten most prosperous. Eurostat, Brussels.
European Commission. (2012) Guide to research report and innovation strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS3), European Union, Luxembourg. Available at:http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/smart_specialisation/smart_ris3_2012.pdf
Fischer-Kowalski, M. and Haberl, H. (Eds.) (2007). Socioecological Transitions and Global Change: Trajectories of Social Metabolism and Land Use, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Gibb, A. (2005). Towards the Entrepreneurial University; Entrepreneurship Education as a lever for change. National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship: UK.
Goddard J, Pukkaa J (2008) The Engagement of Higher Education Institutions in Regional Development: An Overview of the Opportunities and Challenges. Higher Education Management and Policy 21 (2): 11-41.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M. and Mian, S. (2010). Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small business economics47(3), 551-563.
Gholami, Z., Arasteh, H., Noveh Ebrahim, A., Zeinabadi, H., R. (2018). educational function in developing the third-generation universities in Iran: Desiginig a. conceptual model. Journal of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 11(4),31-38. [in Persian]
Hemlin, S, Allwood, CM and Martin, BR (2004). Creative knowledge environments. The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Jacob, M., Hellstro¨m, T., Adler, N. and Norrgren, F. (2000). From sponsorship to partnership in academyindustry relations. R&D Management, 30(3), 255–262.
Kordanaij, A., Ahmadi; P., Ghorbani, Z. and Niakan Lahiji, N. (2012). Investigating the characteristics of the entrepreneurial university in Tarbiat Modares University. Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, (3)5, 47-.64. [in Persian]م
Laptevа, A. V. and Efimov, V. S. (2016). New generation of universities. University 4.0. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 11 (2016 9) 2681-2696.
Lee, Y. M., & Yang, C. (2014). The relationships among network ties, organizational agility, and organizational performance: A study of the flat glass industry in Taiwan. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(2), 206-226.
Leja, K. (2009). Social responsibility of universities-the example of AGH University of Science and Technology. e-mentor.
Lukovics, M. and Zuti, B. (2017). New functions of universities in century XXI towards “fourth generation” universities. Academia. edu9.
Lukovics, M. and Zuti, B. (2017). Successful universities towards the improvement of regional competitiveness:‘fourth generation’universities. Available at SSRN 3022717.
McMullan, W. and Vesper, K. (1987). New ventures and small business innovation for economic growth. R&D Management, 17(1), 3–13.
Mirkamali, M., Farhadi Rad, H. (2013). An exploration of university organizational structures in order to present an integrated model, Quarterly Scientific-Research Journal of Educational Management Research, 5(1), 75-100. [in Persian]
Mousavi, S.H. (2018). Presenting a model for the development of entrepreneurial universities in Iranian public universities. PhD thesis. University of Mazandaran.[in Persian]
Mowery, D. C. and Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh– Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31(3), 399–418.
Nabipour, A. (2012). The Fifth Generation University: Based on the Five-Helix Model of Karaiannis and Campbell. Southern Medicine, 23 (2), 165-194. [in Persian]
Naranjisani F, Ebadi R, Mustafavi Z,Yousbashi A 2017, Identifying the Learning Needs of Faculty Members in Higher Education, Journal of Educational and College Studies, vol.3,no.10, 29-53.[in Persian]
Nematollahi, Z., Ranaei Kordsholi, H., Ali Mohammad Lu, M. and Salimi, Q. (2019). A systematic review of the capabilities of the third generation university. Journal of Education and Learning Studies, (1)11, 183-217. [in Persian]
Oztel H. (2020). Fourth generation university: co-creating a sustainable future. In: Quality education. Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals. Cham: Springer Publisher.
Pawlowski K. (2009) The ‘Fourth Generation University’ as a Creator of the Local and Regional Development. Higher Education in Europe 34 (1): 51-64.
Raisioun, M. (2018). Designing a Model for the Organizational Structure of Medical Sciences Universities in the Transition to a Third Generation University. PhD Thesis, Allameh Tabatabaei University.[in Persian]
Rothaermel, F. T.; Agung, S. D.; Jiang, L., (2007), “University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791.
Sadegh, M., Naz Azari, K., Taghvaei Yazdi, M. (2019). Investigating the impact of virtual approach infrastructures on competency-based education in line with fourth-generation universities, Quarterly Journal of the Center for Studies and Development of Medical Sciences Education, (4)10, 363-375.[in Persian]
Saxena, R., Bhat, V. and Jhingan, A. (2017). Leapfrogging to Education 4.0: Student at the core. FICC Higher Education Committee.
Shane, S. and S. Venkataraman (2000), ‘The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’. Academy of Management Review 25(1), 217–226.
Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the third generation university: Managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wagdi, O., Abouzeid, W. and Fathy, H. E. D. (2021). Restructuring and Transformation of Arab Educational Institutions into Fourth-Generation Universities. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT)12(14), 5763-5781.
Zehtabi, M. (2015). Developing the Entrepreneurial Universities Model. PhD Thesis. University of Tehran.[in Persian]