بررسی نقش گرایش کارآفرینانه بر عملکرد نوآوری در صنایع هوایی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت کسب و کار، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار دانشگاه پدافند هوایی خاتم الانبیاء (ص)، تهران، ایران

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: در دنیای پیچیده و پویای امروز، نوآوری به‌عنوان مزیت رقابتی کلیدی در صنایع پیشرفته، به‌ویژه صنعت هوافضا و هوایی، شناخته می‌شود. از سوی دیگر، گرایش کارآفرینانه سازمان‌ها می‌تواند بستر مناسبی برای ارتقاء عملکرد نوآوری فراهم سازد. با توجه به ماهیت راهبردی و فناورانه صنایع هوایی، بررسی رابطه بین گرایش کارآفرینانه و عملکرد نوآورانه این صنایع، می‌تواند بینش‌های کاربردی برای سیاست‌گذاران، مدیران و پژوهشگران فراهم آورد. هدف این پژوهش، تحلیل تأثیر ابعاد مختلف گرایش کارآفرینانه بر عملکرد نوآوری در صنایع هوایی ایران است.. 
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و به لحاظ ماهیت، پژوهشی توصیفی- همبستگی و از نظر نوع داده‌ها، کمی ‎است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل شرکت‌های صنایع هوایی ایرانی است. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق پرسشنامه استاندارد گردآوری شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از طریق مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار اِسمارت پی‌اِل‌اِس 3 انجام پذیرفت.
یافته‌ها: تحلیل‌ داده‌ها نشان داد که جهت‌گیری یادگیری رابطه میان گرایش کارآفرینانه و عملکرد نوآوری محصول را میانجی‌گری می‌کند. این یافته نشان داد که در حالی که گرایش کارآفرینانه به طور مستقیم بر عملکرد نوآوری محصول تأثیرگذار دارد، جهت‌گیری یادگیری می‌تواند این تأثیر را افزایش دهد و نقش حیاتی خود را در فرآیند نوآوری نشان دهد.
نتیجه‌گیری: این مطالعه بر اهمیت تقویت جهت‌گیری یادگیری در شرکت‌ها برای تقویت اثرات مثبت گرایش کارآفرینانه بر عملکرد نوآوری محصول تأکید دارد. با انجام این پژوهش، شرکت‌ها ​​می‌توانند عملکرد بهتری در محیط رقابتی امروز داشته باشند و قابلیت‌های نوآورانه خود را بهبود بخشند. تقویت این گرایش در سطح سازمانی می‌تواند موجب ارتقاء ظرفیت‌های نوآورانه، افزایش رقابت‌پذیری و بهبود عملکرد فناورانه در این صنعت راهبردی شود. مدیران و سیاست‌گذاران می‌توانند با حمایت از فرهنگ کارآفرینی و طراحی ساختارهای مشوق، بستر مناسبی برای شکوفایی نوآوری فراهم سازند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation Performance in Aviation Industry

نویسندگان [English]

  • Armin Khaleghi Forghani 1
  • Hossein Fathabadi 2
1 Assistant Prof., Business Administration Department, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Khatam Al-Anbiya Air Defense University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background & Purpose: In today's complex and dynamic world, innovation is recognized as a key competitive advantage in advanced industries, especially the aerospace and aviation industry. On the other hand, the entrepreneurial orientation of organizations can provide a suitable platform for improving innovation performance. Considering the strategic and technological nature of the aviation industries, examining the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and innovative performance of these industries can provide practical insights for policymakers, managers, and researchers. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of different dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation on innovation performance in the Iranian aviation industries.
Methodology: This study is applied in terms of purpose, survey-correlative research in terms of nature, and quantitative in terms of data type. The statistical population of this study includes Iranian aviation companies. Research data were collected through a standard questionnaire. Data analysis was performed through structural equation modeling using the partial least squares method using SmartPLS3 software.
Findings: The analysis of the research data showed that learning orientation mediates the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and product innovation performance. This finding indicated that while entrepreneurial orientation directly affects product innovation performance, learning orientation can enhance this effect and demonstrate its vital role in the innovation process.
Conclusion: This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening learning orientation in companies to enhance the positive effects of entrepreneurial orientation on product innovation performance. By conducting this research, companies can perform better in today's competitive environment and improve their innovative capabilities. Strengthening this orientation at the organizational level can promote innovative capacities, increase competitiveness, and improve technological performance in this strategic industry. Managers and policymakers can provide a suitable platform for innovation to flourish by supporting an entrepreneurial culture and designing incentive structures.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneurial orientation
  • innovation performance
  • Learning orientation

مراجع

الیاسی، مهدی؛ منطقی، منوچهر؛ بامداد صوفی، جهانیار و میرباقری، سید محمد. (1397). بررسی راهبردهای همپایی شرکت‌های نوظهور در صنعت هوایی و دلالت‌هایی برای صنعت هوایی ایران. بهبود مدیریت، 12(4)، 118-136.
Abid, N., Ceci, F., & Aftab, J. (2023). Attaining sustainable business performance under resource constraints: Insights from an emerging economy. Sustainable Development, 31(1), 114–129.
Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 11-24.
Allameh, S. M., & Khalilakbar, R. (2018). Exploring the antecedents of innovation performance: the roles of entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation and organisational learning. International Journal of Business Excellence, 14(4), 470-485.
Aloulou, W. J. (2018). Examining entrepreneurial orientation’s dimensions–performance relationship in Saudi family businesses: Contingency role of family involvement in management. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(2), 126-145.
Anderson, B. S., Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Eshima, Y. (2015). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1579-1596.
Anderson, B. S., Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Eshima, Y. (2015). Reconceptualizing Entrepreneurial Orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1579-1596.
Argote, L., & Hora, M. (2017). Organizational learning and management of technology. Production and Operations Management, 26(4), 579-590.
Baker, W. E., Mukherjee, D., & Perin, M. G. (2022). Learning orientation and competitive advantage: A critical synthesis and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 144, 863-873.
Bendak, S., Shikhli, A. M., & Abdel-Razek, R. H. (2020). How changing organizational culture can enhance innovation: Development of the innovative culture enhancement framework. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1712125.
Beyene, K. T., Shi, C. S., & Wu, W. W. (2016). Linking culture, organizational learning orientation and product innovation performance: The case of Ethiopian manufacturing firms. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(1), 88-101.
Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 354-363.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.
Cho, G., Hwang, H., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). Cutoff criteria for overall model fit indexes in generalized structured component analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(4), 189-202.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.
Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2019). Crafting High-Impact Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Some Suggested Guidelines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1), 3-18.
Dawid, H., Keoula, M. Y., Kopel, M., & Kort, P. M. (2023). Dynamic investment strategies and leadership in product innovation. European Journal of Operational Research, 306(1), 431-447.
Dukeov, I., Bergman, J. P., Heilmann, P., & Nasledov, A. (2020). Impact of a firm's commitment to learning and open-mindedness on its organizational innovation among Russian manufacturing firms. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(4), 551-569.
Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90.
Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 67-80.
Han, Y., & Zhang, J. (2021). Strategic orientation, product innovation performance, and the role of internal and external learning. Journal of Business Research, 128, 488-498.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20.
Hu, Q., & Hughes, M. (2020). Radical innovation in family firms: The role of non-family employees. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 11(2), 100338.
Hughes, M., Martin, S. L., Morgan, R. E., & Robson, M. J. (2019). Realizing Product-Market Advantage in High-Technology International New Ventures: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation. Journal of International Marketing, 27(2), 1-21.
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
Kraus, S., Burtscher, J., Vallaster, C., & Angerer, M. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship orientation: A reflection on status-quo research and a new conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 725-737.
Kraus, S., Vonmetz, C., Orlandi, L. B., Zardini, A., & Rossignoli, C. (2023). Disruptive innovation: The cornerstone of the future economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121421.
Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020). Learning orientation and innovation performance: the mediating role of operations strategy and supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(4), 457-474.
Lumpkin, G. T. (2018). Perspectives on Entrepreneurship: Past and Future Contributions to the Field. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 3-13.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
Meekaewkunchorn, N., Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., Muangmee, C., Kassakorn, N., & Khalid, B. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance: The mediating role of learning orientation. Economics & Sociology, 14(2), 294-312.
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773.
Polder, M., Leeuwen, G. V., Mohnen, P., & Raymond, W. (2010). Product, process and organizational innovation: drivers, complementarity and productivity effects. CIRANO-scientific publications 2010s-28.
Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499-515.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787.
Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305-318.
Tajeddini, K. (2016). Effect of market orientation and learning orientation on innovativeness: The case of the Swiss watch industry. European Business Review, 28(2), 150-171.
Thomke, S. H. (2020). Experimentation works: The surprising power of business experiments. Harvard Business Press.
Wales, W. J., Gupta, V. K., & Mousa, F. T. (2021). Empirical Research on Entrepreneurial Orientation: An Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research. International Small Business Journal, 39(2), 93-123.
Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635-657.
Wang, L. C., Chan, K. C., Hwang, Y., & Lim, S. (2024). Organizational learning and innovation: The role of learning orientation. Journal of Business Research, 147, 134-146.
Wang, M., Chan, R. Y., Hwang, K. S., & Lim, M. K. (2024). The influence of learning orientation on corporate sustainability: Serial mediation of supply chain practices. European Management Journal, 42(1), 45–58.
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71-91.
Wilson, G. A., & Liguori, E. (2023). Market orientation, failure learning orientation, and financial performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(6), 3027-3045.
Wolff, J. A., Pett, T. L., & Ring, J. K. (2015). Small firm growth as a function of both learning orientation and entrepreneurial orientation: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(5), 709-730.
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43-58.
Zhai, Y. M., Sun, W. Q., Tsai, S. B., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., & Chen, Q. (2018). An empirical study on entrepreneurial orientation, absorptive capacity, and SMEs’ innovation performance: A sustainable perspective. Sustainability, 10(2), 314.

فایل ها

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار