مدیریت دفاع هوایی

مدیریت دفاع هوایی

Designing and Developing a Knowledge-Based Human Resource Management Model in Research Organizations

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 PhD Student in Public Administration, Graduate Studies Center, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Public Administration, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Background & Purpose: In research organizations, human capital is regarded as the most important source of knowledge creation, innovation, and organizational performance. Accordingly, the effectiveness of human resource management in such organizations largely depends on the extent to which human resource policies and practices are aligned with the requirements of knowledge generation, development, sharing, utilization, and retention. Despite the growing importance of knowledge-based human resource management, there remains a need for a model that is tailored to the characteristics of research organizations. Therefore, this study aimed to design and develop a knowledge-based human resource management model for research organizations.
Methodology: In terms of purpose, this study was developmental-applied, and in terms of methodology, it employed a descriptive-survey design conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the Delphi method was used to identify and validate the dimensions and indicators of knowledge-based human resource management. The Delphi panel consisted of academic and organizational experts with relevant expertise and experience. In the second stage, managers, experts, and knowledge workers were surveyed to assess the current status of knowledge-based human resource management. Data were collected using a Delphi questionnaire in the first stage and a structured questionnaire in the second stage.
Findings: The results of the Delphi process led to the identification and validation of an integrated knowledge-based human resource management model comprising six dimensions and 59 indicators. These dimensions included human resource acquisition, human resource training and development, human resource utilization, performance appraisal, compensation, and human resource retention. The assessment of the current status also indicated that knowledge-based human resource management at the Niroo Research Institute was not at a desirable level across any of the six dimensions. This finding indicates that existing human resource practices have not yet been sufficiently aligned with the requirements of knowledge-based work and the characteristics of specialized and research-oriented human resources.
Conclusion: The proposed six-dimensional model can provide a comprehensive framework for aligning the core functions of human resource management with the requirements of research organizations. Applying this model can facilitate the targeted acquisition and development of specialized human capital, more effective utilization of knowledge workers’ capabilities, establishment of appropriate performance appraisal and compensation systems, and ultimately enhancement of the organization’s capacity to retain talent and organizational knowledge.
کلیدواژه‌ها

Alvesson, M. (2011). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford University Press.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Butler, P., et al. (1997). A revolution in interaction. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 4–23.
DeNisi, A. S., & Pritchard, R. D. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00042.x
Donnelly, R. (2019). Aligning knowledge sharing interventions with the promotion of firm success: The need for strategic HRM to balance tensions and challenges. Journal of Business Research, 94, 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.007
Dörhöfer, S. (2012). Knowledge-based HRM: An integrative approach. European Journal of Social Sciences, 28(4), 473–488.
Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers' creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50(6), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20454
Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Guo, Y., & Rammal, H. G. (2022). Knowledge worker mobility and knowledge management in MNEs: A bibliometric analysis and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 142, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.056
Fincham, R. (2007). Knowledge work as occupational strategy: Comparing IT and management consulting. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(1), 16–28.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
Haesli, A., & Boxall, P. (2005). When knowledge management meets HR strategy: An exploration of personalization-retention and codification-recruitment configurations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(11), 1955–1975. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500314680
Horwitz, F. M., Heng, C. T., & Quazi, H. A. (2003). Finders, keepers? Attracting, motivating and retaining knowledge workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(4), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2003.tb00103.x
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/256741
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Barton, S. M. (2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: A test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers. The Social Science Journal, 38(2), 233–250.
Lee, T. W., & Maurer, S. D. (1997). The retention of knowledge workers with the unfolding model of voluntary turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 7(3), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90008-5
Levesque, L. L. (2005). Intangible asset valuation: An exploratory study. Human Resource Management, 44(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20072
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley.
Liu, N.-C., & Liu, M.-S. (2011). Human resource practices and individual knowledge-sharing behavior: An empirical study for Taiwanese R&D professionals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(4), 981–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.555138
Marks, A., & Scholarios, D. (2007). Revisiting technical workers: Professional and organisational identities in the software industry. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(2), 98–117.
McCarthy, A., Almeida, S., & Ahrens, J. (2014). University research scientists as knowledge workers: Contract status and employment opportunities. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(16), 2219–2233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.561241
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2000). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. McGraw-Hill.
Redman, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2006). Contemporary human resource management: Text and cases. Pearson Education.
Sutherland, M., & Jordaan, W. (2004). Factors affecting the retention of knowledge workers. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 2(2), 55–64.
Swart, J. (2009). HRM and knowledge workers. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell, & P. Wright (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human resource management (pp. 450–468). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199547029.003.0022
Wright, P. M., Coff, R., & Moliterno, T. P. (2013). Strategic HRM in building micro-foundations of organizational knowledge-based performance. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.10.001